ContactI respond to ALL mails that are not spam within a day or two, with a real answer, not a script even if it takes hours to answer them. IF you mailed me and got no response, it got intercepted.
Web resourcesI am going to post the most valuable web resources here.
This is the best video sniping site, you don't have to buy the app, just use it and let it use Java.
Internet explorer hates this, but Google chrome works fine.
This is the best absolute stealth mode Linux out there, (Kills ubuntu dead) but you need an older PC for it (4 or more years)
When it downloads, double click it with a burnable CD in your drive, NOT a dvd, and it will take care of the rest. Re-boot via CD and enjoy. You don't have to install it, and it leaves your computer untouched.
Since Vialls work was so similar to mine, it will be archived here.
For reference in the following articles, read the Fukushima reportI don't want to get into a hissing match every time another journalist messes up and I am asked to put it straight.
So I am going to be a little more polite now when I do it.
In this interview, James Corbett was fooled into making the following claims: that 1. The U.S. gave Japan 70 tons of weapons grade PLUTONIUM for a secret weapons program, and that 2. The breeder reactor was a failure in the U.S. that cost twenty billion dollars, was in development for far too long, and after giving up on the breeder reactor program, America turned it over to Japan so that their "superior" engineers could "close the nuclear loop - the nuclear fuel cycle."
First a little math. At 70 tons, that's 70,000 KG of weapons grade Plutonium. At 4 kg per nuclear warhead needed per bomb, that's 17,500 of the GOOD nuclear warheads, not junk. So force of logic says that such claims are ludicrous, NO NATION GIVES AWAY THAT MUCH MATERIAL. That's more than TWICE our current arsenal. So the logic loop, to take blame off Israel will be, Japan was making a nuclear bomb right below reactor 3 and THAT is what blew it sky high, NOT: Magna Bsp's Owl
Now onto the next error in Corbett's report
The man he interviewed bamboozled him into believing America did not close the nuclear fuel cycle and failed after spending "twenty billion dollars" That's unfortunate for Corbett, because as part of the Fukushima report, I actually hunted down one of the four top American engineers involved with the breeder reactor, and here is what he had to say about it:
"I started in the American nuclear program all the way back at the time of the Manhattan project, and have been involved in reactor design and nuclear engineering my whole life. There was one answer we all searched for, and it was how to close the nuclear loop.
When a reactor such as a boiling water reactor uses fuel, the waste products (which are highly radioactive isotopes that have a different fission characteristic than the fuel) build up in the fuel and poison the nuclear reaction. A reactor such as a boiling water reactor can only use the fuel until it gets contaminated by these isotopes enough to change the nature of the nuclear reactions taking place. The reaction environment inside a boiling water reactor is only one such environment that will work to trigger a chain reaction, and if that spent fuel is put into a reactor made from different materials, those materials can favor the burning of the poisonous isotopes, and use the isotopes as fuel until the fuel is purified of them, and therefore had it's original radiological characteristics restored. Once that is accomplished, the fuel can go back into the boiling water reactor, and used as new.
We perfected the second reactor design, which used liquid sodium as a coolant, and the reactor ran much hotter - 1100 farenheit as opposed to 550 in a boiling water reactor. The liquid sodium circulated inside the reactor in lieu of water, with the heat of the reaction being removed from the system by a heat exchanger which boiled the water outside the reactor for use in producing electricity. The temperature difference and coolant characteristics facilitated the burning of the isotopes, and you got to use both sides of the reaction - one side produced electricity while poisoning the fuel, and the other side produced electricity while burning the poisons out. This process can be repeated 20 times, and when it is finished the fuel is DEAD and no longer hazardous because all of it's radiological potential has been used up. It was a dream come true, and Carter banned it by executive order!"
He specifically stated that the burn down was so complete that the spent fuel was safe to handle directly with bare hands, and needed no special care or maintenance at all. He stated that they got it a LOT sooner than expected, and as a result, fortunately all the nuclear facilities were over built to handle waste fuel because they expected it to build up before this technology could be perfected, when in reality the technology was perfected long before that (in 1977). He VERY CLEARLY STATED IT WAS DONE BY G.E. and came in WAY under budget, FAR FAR under budget.
Corbett landed himself a big fat LIAR.
The engineer then went on to lament about what a waste of money it was to ban the technology, because the fuel is expensive, and they were only using it to about five percent of its total potential. He lamented the fact that his life's greatest accomplishment got banned for no good reason, and it was a tremendous waste of money to not use the technology his team developed. Electricity would have been cheap. REAL CHEAP. So cheap that homes would not have been heated with oil or natural gas, electricity would have been the only sensible choice. Furthermore, with a reduction in the price of electricity by at least 10X, electric cars would have been a no brainer.
This would have been America's free energy future, with the only real cost being maintenance of infrastructure. There would have been no nuclear waste, he specifically stated that you could make a bed out of the truly spent fuel and sleep on it safely. Nuclear waste would have been a thing of the past.
I will tell you exactly what I think about this getting banned.It got banned because the last real president, who was NOT an enemy of the state, got MURDERED. We have had enemies in power ever since. LOOK at what has happened to this nation since Kennedy! We now have doctors issuing antidpressants that blow people's existence, vaccines that destroy the children, our industry got shipped overseas, our media over run by zionist filth, our schools destroyed, you name it, it IS NOT what it was at the time of Kennedy and there is a REASON. That reason is the EXACT same reason this engineer's life's work got shelved along with moon missions, the space shuttle, the EV1. We should have been to Mars by now, and absent a government that is actively seeking to destroy us, we would have had the HAL9000 and it probably would not have malfunctioned. Now to go into space we have to hitch a ride with the Chinese. Can ANYONE EXPLAIN THAT? Corbett, I have looked over your other stuff and think there is a good reason to believe you tried, but you missed it big time with this one. Better luck next time.
Don't worry about reactor 4!(WORRY about reactor 3!)
This report proves that the fuel pool at reactor 4 is stable. It also proves that the reactor was NOT in operation when it "exploded", and in addition to the classified photos and testimony of Tepco, that the reactor was dis-assembled and undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud when it "exploded".
IF the reactor had been in operation when it "exploded" there would have been a melt down and radioactive material thrown everywhere and they would not be able to take apart the top section of the containment OR would NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS been able to go INSIDE the containment, under the fuel pool and re-enforce it. They are going along with a BIG FAT LIE under THREAT, and the linked report proves it!The other reactors are totally inaccessible, because the radiation levels in their containment structures are up to 1,300 sieverts an hour, a level that will kill you in exactly 15 seconds. That's not enough time for people to go in and install those supports, and I really don't think asimo, despite being a brilliant robot, is up to the job.
The fact that those supports are in place now proves that the pool is not leaking as some claim, and that there is no way that reactor could have been in operation when the quake struck.
So, WHAT is the real story?_______________________________________________
What it looks like when my site gets attacked |
ArchivesMy writing did not start with this site. I will fill in history over time by posting previous articles here
Prior to the Fukushima war disaster, this was a photography site.
These were old non-news articles, from the ancient days, originally used to drive traffic to the photos.